called equivalent fractions. That means that, in a calculation, we could replace either one with the other.
on multiplying both 2 and 3 by 5.
To see the answer, pass your mouse over the colored area.
To cover the answer again, click "Refresh" ("Reload").
Do the problem yourself first!
The denominator has been multiplied by 3; therefore the numerator will also be multiplied by 3.
("The denominator has been multiplied by _____. Therefore the numerator will also be multiplied by ____.")
You do algebra with your eyes.
| a) |
x |
= |
3x 3 |
|
b) |
2 |
= |
2ab ab |
|
c) |
x |
= |
x³ x2 |
| d) |
1 |
= |
x x |
|
e) |
2 |
= |
2x + 2 x + 1 |
|
f) |
x + 1 |
= |
x2 − 1 x − 1 |
Part f) is The Difference of Two Squares.
There will be more problems of this type at the 2nd Level.
Reducing to lowest terms
The numerator and denominator of a fraction are called its terms. Since we may multiply both terms, then, symmetrically, we may divide both terms.
"We may divide both the numerator and denominator
by a common factor."
When we do that, we say that we have reduced the fraction to its lowest terms.
Again, this is the same as in arithmetic.
5 is a common factor of the numerator and denominator. Therefore we may divide each of them by 5.
As a shorthand, we say that we have "canceled" the 5's. But that can be a very misleading shorthand, as the following example will show.
|
Example 3. Reduce |
5 + x 5 + y |
. |
Answer. This can not be reduced. We cannot "cancel" the 5's, because 5 is not a factor of either the numerator or the denominator. In both of them, 5 is a term.
We cannot cancel terms.
The word term does double duty in algebra. We speak of the terms of a sum and also the terms of a fraction, which are the numerator and denominator. A fraction is in its lowest terms when the terms -- the numerator and denominator -- have no common factors.
| |
|
Example 4. Reduce |
3a + 6b + 9c 12d |
. |
Answer. When the numerator or denominator is made up of a sum of terms, then if every term has a common factor, we may divide every term
by it.
In this example, every term in both the numerator and denominator has a factor
3. Therefore, upon dividing every term by 3, we can write immediately:
3a + 6b + 9c 12d |
= |
a + 2b + 3c 4d |
There is no more canceling -- no more dividing. The numerator and denominator no longer have a common factor.
We could show the common factor explicitly, by writing
3a + 6b + 9c 12d |
= |
3(a + 2b + 3c) 3·4d |
But actually factoring in that way is not required.
This example illustrates the following:
To divide a sum -- 3a + 6b + 9c -- by a number,
we must be able to divide every term by that number.
|
Example 5. Reduce |
3a + 6b + 8c 12d |
. |
Answer. Not possible. The numerator and denominator have no common factor. 2 is not a common factor, because 2 is not a factor of 3a. And 3 is not a common factor, because 3 is not a factor of 8c. That fraction is in its lowest terms.
In other words, we may not cancel part of the numerator -- one term, such as 3a. The entire numerator must have a common factor, as in Example 4.
|
Example 6. Reduce |
8x 8x + 10 |
. |
Answer. 2 is a factor of every term in both the numerator and denominator. Therefore we may divide every term by 2.
There is no more dividing. We cannot "cancel" the 4x's, because 4x is not a factor of the denominator. 4x is not a factor of 5.
Problem 6. Reduce to lowest terms.
| a) |
3a 3b |
= |
a b |
|
b) |
8xy 12x |
= |
2y 3 |
|
c) |
56y 77xy |
= |
8 11x |
| d) |
2x + 6 4x + 8 |
= |
x + 3 2x + 4 |
, on dividing every term in both the numerator and denominator by 2. |
| e) |
2x + 3 4x + 9 |
= |
No canceling! The terms of the numerator and denominator have no common factor. |
We may think of this as 4x divided by x.
When the numerator cancels completely, we must write 1. For,
x = x· 1.
|
Example 9. Reduce |
x − 3 6(x − 3) |
. |
| Answer. |
x − 3 6(x − 3) |
= |
1 6 |
. |
We can view x − 3 as a factor of the numerator, because
x − 3 = (x − 3)· 1
Again, when the numerator cancels completely, we must write 1.
Problem 7. Reduce.
| a) |
2a a |
= |
2 |
|
b) |
a ab |
= |
1 b |
|
c) |
2x 8xy |
= |
1 4y |
| d) |
5(x − 2) x − 2 |
= |
5 |
|
e) |
x + 1 2(x + 1) |
= |
1 2 |
|
f) |
3(x + 2)x 6(x + 2)xy |
= |
1 2y |
|
Example 10. Reduce |
15x 5x − 3 |
. |
Answer. Not possible
The numerator and denominator have no common factor.
|
Example 11. Reduce |
x2 − x − 6 x2 − 4x + 3 |
. |
Answer. In its present form, there is no canceling -- because there are no common factors. But we can make factors:
x2 − x − 6 x2 − 4x + 3 |
= |
(x − 3)(x + 2) (x − 3)(x − 1) |
= |
x + 2 x − 1 |
(x −3) is shown to be a common factor. We can cancel it. And when we do, the numerator and denominator no longer have a common factor. The end.
| Example 12. Reduce: |
4x³ − 9x2 4x³ + 6x2 |
. |
Answer. The only common factor is x2. And we could display it by factoring both the numerator and denominator:
4x³ − 9x2 4x³ + 6x2 |
= |
x2(4x − 9) 2x2(2x + 3) |
= |
4x − 9 2(2x + 3) |
The fraction is now in its lowest terms. No common factors.
Problem 8. Reduce.
| a) |
5x 10x + 15 |
= |
5x 5(2x + 3) |
= |
x 2x + 3 |
| b) |
3x − 12 3x |
= |
3(x − 4) 3x |
= |
x − 4 x |
| c) |
12x − 18y + 21z 6y |
= |
4x − 6y + 7z 2y |
, |
upon dividing every term by their common factor, 3.
| d) |
2m m2 − 2m |
= |
2m m(m − 2) |
= |
2 m − 2 |
| e) |
x2 − x x |
= |
x(x − 1) x |
= |
x − 1 |
| f) |
12x2 16x5 − 20x2 |
= |
12x2 4x2(4x3 − 5) |
= |
3 4x3 − 5 |
| g) |
x + 3 4x + 12 |
= |
x + 3 4(x + 3) |
= |
1 4 |
| h) |
2x − 8 x − 4 |
= |
2(x − 4) x − 4 |
= |
2 |
| i) |
2x − 2y 3x −
3y |
| = |
2(x − y) 3(x − y) |
= |
2 3 |
Problem 9. Make factors, and reduce.
| a) |
x2 − 2x − 3 x2 − x − 2 |
= |
(x + 1)(x − 3) (x + 1)(x − 2) |
= |
x − 3 x − 2 |
| b) |
x2 + x − 2 x2 − x − 6 |
= |
(x + 2)(x − 1) (x + 2)(x − 3) |
= |
x − 1 x − 3 |
| c) |
x2 − 2x + 1 x2 − 1 |
= |
(x − 1)2 (x + 1)(x − 1) |
= |
x − 1 x + 1 |
| d) |
x2 − 100 x + 10 |
= |
(x + 10)(x − 10) x + 10 |
= |
x − 10 |
| e) |
x + 3 x2 + 6x + 9 |
= |
x + 3 (x + 3)2 |
= |
1 x + 3 |
| f) |
x³ + 4x2 _ x2 + x − 12 |
= |
x2(x + 4) (x − 3)(x + 4) |
= |
x2 x − 3 |
Problem 10. Reduce to lowest terms -- if possible.
| a) |
3 + x 3x |
|
Not possible. The numerator and denominator have no common factors. |
| b) |
8a + b 2ab |
|
Not possible. Again, no common factors. |
| c) |
8a + 2b 2ab |
= |
2(4a + b) 2ab |
= |
4a + b ab |
| d) |
6a + b 3a + b |
|
Not possible. The numerator and denominator have no common factors. 3 is not a factor of either the numerator or denominator. It is a factor only of the first term in each. |
| f) |
2x + 4y + 6z 10 |
= |
x + 2y + 3z 5 |
Divide every term by 2. |
| g) |
2x + 4y + 5z 10 |
|
Not possible. The numerator and denominator have no common factor. |
| h) |
(x + 1) + (x + 2) (x + 1)(x + 3) |
|
Not possible. The numerator is not made up of factors. |
| i) |
(x + 1)(x + 2) (x + 1)(x + 3) |
= |
x + 2 x + 3 |
| j) |
ab + c abc |
= |
|
Not possible. The numerator and denominator have no common factors. |
| k) |
ab + ac abc |
= |
a(b + c) abc |
= |
b + c bc |
| l) |
x2 − x − 12 x2 + x − 6 |
= |
(x + 3)(x − 4) (x + 3)(x − 2) |
= |
x − 4 x − 2 |
2nd Level
Next Lesson: Negative exponents
Table of Contents | Home
Please make a donation to keep TheMathPage online.
Even $1 will help.
Copyright © 2013 Lawrence Spector
Questions or comments?
E-mail: themathpage@nyc.rr.com