Natural numbers: cardinal and ordinal
The natural numbers are the counting numbers. They have two forms, cardinal and ordinal. The cardinal forms are
One, two, three, four, and so on.
They answer the question How much? or How many?. The ordinal forms are
First, second, third, fourth,
and so on.
They answer the question Which one?.
Parts of natural numbers
We say that a smaller number is a part of a larger number if the larger number is its multiple.
Here are the first few multiples of 5:
5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35.
5 is the first multiple of 5. 10 is the second multiple; 15, the third; and so on.
5 is a part of each one of those, except itself.
Now, since 15, for example, is the third multiple of 5, we say that 5 is the third part of 15. We use that same ordinal number to name the part.
5 is the fourth part of 20. It is the fifth part of 25; the sixth part of 30. And so on.
5 is which part of 10? We do not say the second part. We say half. 5 is half of 10.
So with the exception of half, we name the parts with ordinal numbers. Each ordinal number names which part.
Again, 5 is not a part of itself. There is no such thing as the first part. (See Skill in Arithmetic, Lesson 15.)
It is important to understand that we are not speaking here of proper fractions -- numbers that are less than 1, and that we need for measuring. We are explaining how the ordinal numbers -- third, fourth, fifth, and so on -- name the parts of the cardinal numbers. We will come to those fractional symbols shortly.
Problem 1. 7 is which part of 28?
The fourth.
To see the answer, pass your mouse over the colored area.
To cover the answer again, click "Refresh" ("Reload").
Problem 2. Which part of 45 is 9?
The fifth.
Problem 3. 6 is which part of 12?
Half.
Problem 4. What number is the eighth part of 24?
3
Problem 5. 3 is the tenth part of what number?
30
Parts, plural
The figure shows that we have divided 15 into thirds, that is, into three equal parts, and that each 5 is a third part of 15.
5, 10, 15.
Therefore, 10 -- which is two 5's -- is two third parts of 15. One third. Two thirds. 5, 10.
Now, 10 is not a part of 15, because 15 is not a multiple of 10. We say that it is parts of 15, plural: Two third parts, or simply two thirds. Those words are to be taken literally.
Similarly, if we divide 15 into fifths, that is, into five equal parts --
-- then
3 is the fifth part of 15.
6 is two fifth parts of 15.
9 is three fifth parts of 15. (Count them!)
12 is four fifth parts of 15, or simply four fifths.
And 15 is all five of its fifth parts.
We can now say what we mean by
The ratio of natural numbers
Definition. The ratio of two natural numbers is their relationship with respect to relative size that we can express verbally in a sentence. Specifically, it is their relationship in which one number is a multiple of the other (so many times it), a part of it, or parts of it.
(Skill in Arithmetic, Lesson 17.)
Example 1. Multiple What ratio has 15 to 5?
Answer. 15 is three times 5.
That is the ratio -- the relationship -- of 15 to 5.
We do not answer "3 to 1," because we want to name the ratio of 15 to 5 explicitly. It is true that 15 is to 5 in the same ratio as 3 is to 1. 3 is three times 1, just as 15 is three times 5.
The two numbers in a ratio are called the terms; the first term and the second.
Notice that we answer with a complete sentence beginning with the first term: "15 is three times 5." For, a ratio is a relationship.
Example 2. Part What ratio has 5 to 15?
Answer. 5 is the third part of 15.
That is the inverse ratio of 15 to 5. The terms are exchanged.
Example 3. Parts What ratio has 10 to 15?
Answer. 10 is two thirds of 15.
Those are the three kinds of ratio: One number is a multiple of the other -- so many times it -- a part of it, or parts of it.
Problem 6. What ratio have the following? Answer with a complete sentence beginning with the first term.
a) 2 to 10?
2 is the fifth part of 10.
is called "one-third" because of the ratio of 1 to 3. 1 is one third of 3.
1 is to 2 as 2 is to 4 as 5 is to 10, etc.
On the practical side, since the student has very likely learned the names of the fractions first, then the ratio of 3 to 4 is expressed by the
Proportions
A proportion is a statement that two ratios are the same.
5 is to 15 as 8 is to 24.
5 is the third part of 15, just as 8 is the third part of 24.
We will now introduce this symbol 5 : 15 to signify the ratio
of 5 to 15. A proportion will then appear as follows:
5 : 15 = 8 : 24.
"5 is to 15 as 8 is to 24."
Or, we can represent a proportion with fractional symbols --
The theorem of the alternate proportion
The numbers in a proportion are called the terms: the 1st, the 2nd, the 3rd, and the 4th.
1st : 2nd = 3rd : 4th
We say that the 1st and the 3rd are corresponding terms, as are the 2nd and the 4th.
The following is the theorem of the alternate proportion:
If four numbers are proportional, then the corresponding terms are also proportional. That is, as the first term is to the third, so the second will be to the fourth.
|
| |
| If |
| a : b = m : n, |
| |
| then, alternately, |
| |
| a : m = b : n. |
Since
1 : 3 = 5 : 15,
then alternately,
1 : 5 = 3 : 15.
(Skill in Arithmetic: Lesson 17, Question 2.)
Example 6. Complete this proportion:
4 : 5 = 12 : ?
| Now, 4 is four fifths of 5 (" |
4 5 |
") |
, but it is not obvious what number 12 |
is four fifths of.
Alternately, however, 4 is a third of 12 -- or we could say that 4 has been multiplied by 3. Therefore 5 also must be multiplied by 3,
4 : 5 = 12 : 15
That is,
4 : 5 = 3 × 4 : 3 × 5
As one 4 is to one 5, so any number of 4's will be to an equal number of 5's. Three 4's are four fifths of three 5's.
This is the theorem of the same multiple.
If we multiply two numbers by the same number, then the products will have the same ratio as the numbers we multiplied.
|
Example 7. Complete this proportion, 5 : 8 = 35 : ?
Answer. Look at it alternately. 35 is
seven times 5. Therefore the missing term will be seven times 8, which is 56.
Problem 8. Complete this proportion, 4 : 9 = 24 : ?
54. The term corresponding to 4 is 6 × 4. Therefore, the missing term must be 6 × 9.
We shall often make use of this basic property of the square root radical:

A radical multiplied by itself
produces the radicand.
(See Lesson 26 of Algebra, Radicals.)
Similar figures
Trigonometry depends on the meaning of similar figures.
Similar figures are equiangular, and the sides that make the equal angles are proportional.
To say then that figures ABCDE, PQRST are similar, is to say that the angle at A is equal to the angle at P, the angle at B is equal to the angle at Q, etc.; and, proportionally, as AB is to BC, so PQ is to QR.
And so on, for each pair of equal angles and the sides that make them.
For triangles to be similar, however, it is sufficient that they be equiangular. (Theorem 15 of "Some Theorems of Plane Geometry.") From that it follows:
Right triangles will be similar if an acute angle of one
is equal to an acute angle of the other.

In the right triangles ABC, DEF, if the acute angle at B is equal to the acute angle at E, then those triangles will be similar. Therefore the sides that make the equal angles will be proportional. For example,
BC : CA = EF : FD.
If BC were twice as long as CA, then EF would also be twice as long as FD.
And alternately, the corresponding sides are proportional:
BC : EF = CA : FD.
If BC were half of EF, then CA would also be half of FD.
Problem 10. The right triangles HJK, LMN are similar, with HJ = 3 cm,

JK = 4 cm, and KH = 5 cm. If LM = 12 cm, then how long are MN and NL?
Alternately,
LM : HJ = MN : JK.
Since LM is four times HJ, then MN will be four times JK -- it will be 16 cm.
Similarly, NL will be four times KH, it will be 20 cm.
To put the whole thing more simply: The side corresponding to HJ has been multiplied by 4. Therefore, since the triangles are similar, every side will be multiplied by 4.
Problem 11. Triangles ABC, DEF are similar.
AB = 6 cm, BC = 11 cm, CA = 7 in, and DE = 18 cm. How long are EF and DF?
The side corresponding to AB has been multiplied by 3. Therefore every side will be multiplied by 3. EF = 33 cm, and DF = 21 cm.
*
Our definition of a proportion has been in terms of the ratio of natural numbers. The sides of a triangle,
however, are not natural numbers. They are lengths, which are magnitudes -- things that have size -- they are not numbers. And magnitudes do not necessarily have the same ratio as natural numbers. They can be "incommensurable." Hence a new theory of ratio and proportion is required which will be applicable to magnitudes. The interested student is referred to
Topic 11 of The Evolution of the Real Numbers, in particular the section "The new theory of proportions."
Next Topic: Definitions of the Trigonometric Functions
of an Acute Angle
The Topics | Home
Please make a donation to keep TheMathPage online.
Even $1 will help.
Copyright © 2012 Lawrence Spector
Questions or comments?
E-mail: themathpage@nyc.rr.com